Writing in the academic world requires composing skills in order to follow standard conventions for the presentation of pieces of work in a field of study. These requirements help to shape the structure of academic papers. The Introduction section outstands as an important component since it not only attracts the reader’s attention (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010) but it describes the problem the article addresses.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the main features in the Introduction section of a medicine research article within the parameters set by Swales and Feak’s (1994) description of introductions (cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010) and the academic style guidelines in the American Psychological Association manual (APA guidelines 2010).
Swales and Feak (1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010) outlined that the structure of introductions follow an organizational pattern that involves three main moves: Move 1, setting the area of research within a theoretical context; Move 2, indicating the present area of exploration/study and Move 3, describing the aims of the study.
For example, the article analyzed fulfills some of the requirements of Move 1 pattern, present perfect tense seems to indicate the writer’s intention to focus on the contemporary relevance of the present study; i.e.: “Comprehensive systematic reviews (…) have estimated that mammography reduces breast cancer mortality by 15-16%” (Jorgensen, Zahl, & Gotzsche, 2010). A sense of detachment appears to be conveyed by the use of impersonal language.
It can also be observed the use of numerals to introduce raw data corresponding to previous research information, which signals that the literature review is also “embedded in Move 1” (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.30). Conceivably, the choice of passive voice instead of past tenses suggests the purpose to compose the manuscript using a scientific discursive style. More information is presented via the insertion of a connector.
Move 2 is indicated by a contrastive connector “However, there are (…) about this result” (Jorgensen et al, 2010) which links the problem posed and the literature review with Move 3. This statement focuses on the most interesting part of the Introduction section since it expresses the author’s concern for the study developed and challenges further reading.
Also, listing connectors have been used to complete the description of the data collected up to the present study. Use of numerals is not always consistent, for some numbers have been written in letters. Use of hyphenation can be noted too. The pattern for in-text citations does seems to follow APA guidelines (2010) but a different format, perhaps one that can be adopted by researchers in the medicine field.
Move 3 evidences the purpose of the study in a non-standard pattern; i.e.: “We hypothesized that (…)” (Jorgensen et al, 2010). This can be regarded as a purposive move (Pintos & Crimi, 2009) because it possibly mentions the general aim of the researchers. However, it does not employ present or past tenses, as required in Swales and Feak’s (1994) description, but present perfect tense to suggest that the conclusions of the study provided negative results.
All in all, the article has been analyzed under the guidelines followed for education papers. As Jorgensen et al’s (2010) paper, in particular, belongs to the medicine field some differences have been encountered. For example, the presentation of data embedded in the literature review looks like supporting the authors’ arguments. The fact that sources have been acknowledged differently indicates a different ruling convention to cite sources. The choice of tenses in the moves indicates the authors’ distinct discursive intention and academic style.
References
Jorgensen, K. J., Zahl, P.H., & Gotzsche, P.C. (2010). Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: Comparative study. British Medical Journal, 340 (c1241), 1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1241
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2009). Unit 2: The Research Article: Introduction, Literature Review and Methods Section. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved April 3, 2010 from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4691
Purdue University Online Writing Lab (OWL) (2010). In text citations: the basics. Retrieved May 22, 2010 from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
(ESP mid-term test)
Jul 10, 2010
Genre analysis of abstracts in research articles
In a research article (RA), the abstract, which appears as the first section in the paper, outlines the rationale behind the study approach by conveying the basic facts of the objective, methods, results and conclusions of the project in a brief statement (Pintos & Crimi, 2010).
The internal structure of abstracts has been depicted by many researchers, i.e.: informative, indicative, structured or unstructured (Swales and Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010).
Moreover, organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA), have issued guidelines for writers to compose abstracts under academic requirements. This paper aims to compare and contrast the abstracts in four different RAs, from the fields of medicine and education, applying APA guidelines (2001) and Swales and Feak’s (1994) classification.
In Almerich, Suárez, Orellana, Belloch, Bo & Gastaldo’s (2005) paper, a solid paragraph forms the abstract. It seems to be unstructured - a long solid paragraph- and informative –heavy on data, descriptive- (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Length is respected; the introduction-methods-results-and-discussion (IMRAD) formula has been used and data about the research findings has been provided to inform the audience.
On the contrary, the abstracts in the three medicine articles appear to be informative and structured -containing sections with sub-headings, i.e.: there are bolded subheadings for the IMRAD formula (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Paragraph length looks like excessive, i.e.; Jorgensen, Zahl & Gotzsche’s (2010) section contain: objective, design, setting, participants, main outcome measure, results and conclusions.
As regards format of abstracts, the title in the educational RA is centered and bolded, with no use of italics or underlining. The fact that the title for the keywords, which could have been included with the purpose to “help researchers find the work in databases and web sites” (APA guidelines, 2010, as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.33), resembles the former, imply that the writers might have selected other guidelines than APA (2001).
Conversely, the organizational structure of the abstracts in the medicine RAs seem to observe a different academic convention. For example, in Martínez, Assimes, Mines, Dell’Aniello and Suissa’s (2010) paper, the title for the abstract and the several subheadings that follow are left-aligned -non-centered. The length of the abstract, which involves many paragraphs, exceeds the APA (2001) standard parameters -125 to 150 words long.
Concerning discursive elements, Almerich et al (2005) denote use of present tenses in the conclusions of the study, probably to aim at challenging future research on the topic. Text composing involves past tense to indicate results, impersonal passive and full affirmative sentences (Graetz, 1985, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Acronyms like “ANOVA model” are unexplained (Almerich et al 2005); perhaps to express common usage in the field area.
Wijeysundera, Beattie, Elliot, Austin, Hux and Laupacis (2010) possibly signal modern relevance of the research (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010) by using present tense in the conclusions. Acronyms are defined in the text to prevent misleading. Negatives are avoided (Graetz, 1985, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). It seems likely that the use of full sentences is limited to the results and conclusions to credit facts.
All in all, the four RAs share a same informative type of structure and evidence some similar organizational characteristics than those depicted by Swales and Feak (1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010); for example, use of past and present tenses, full sentences, acronym clarification, absence of negatives and impersonal passive –conceivably to focus on factual features. Yet, the main differences tend to lie in abstract layout. It might be suggested that medicine RAs obey a different methodological approach than educational RAs.
References
Almerich, J., Suárez, J. M., Orellana, N., Belloch, C., Bo, R., & Gastaldo, I. (2005). Diferencias en los conocimientos de los recursos tecnológicos en profesores a partir del género, edad, y tipo de centro. RELIEVE, 11 (2), 127-142. Retrieved from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=5750
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Jorgensen, K. J., Zahl, P.H., & Gotzsche, P.C. (2010). Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: Comparative study. BMJ, 340 (c1241), 1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1241
Martínez, C., Assimes, T.L., Mines, D., Dell’Aniello, S., & Suissa, S. (2010). Use of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and the risk of sudden cardiac death or near death: A nested case-control study. BMJ, 340 (c249), 1-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c249
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2010). Unit 4: Research Articles: Abstracts. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved May 22, 2010 from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4691
Wijeysundera, D.N., Beattie, W. S., Elliot, R.F., Austin, P. C., Hux, J.E., & Laupacis, A. (2010). Non-invasive cardiac stress testing before elective major non-cardiac surgery: Population based cohort study. BMJ, 340 (b5526), 1-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5526
The internal structure of abstracts has been depicted by many researchers, i.e.: informative, indicative, structured or unstructured (Swales and Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010).
Moreover, organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA), have issued guidelines for writers to compose abstracts under academic requirements. This paper aims to compare and contrast the abstracts in four different RAs, from the fields of medicine and education, applying APA guidelines (2001) and Swales and Feak’s (1994) classification.
In Almerich, Suárez, Orellana, Belloch, Bo & Gastaldo’s (2005) paper, a solid paragraph forms the abstract. It seems to be unstructured - a long solid paragraph- and informative –heavy on data, descriptive- (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Length is respected; the introduction-methods-results-and-discussion (IMRAD) formula has been used and data about the research findings has been provided to inform the audience.
On the contrary, the abstracts in the three medicine articles appear to be informative and structured -containing sections with sub-headings, i.e.: there are bolded subheadings for the IMRAD formula (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Paragraph length looks like excessive, i.e.; Jorgensen, Zahl & Gotzsche’s (2010) section contain: objective, design, setting, participants, main outcome measure, results and conclusions.
As regards format of abstracts, the title in the educational RA is centered and bolded, with no use of italics or underlining. The fact that the title for the keywords, which could have been included with the purpose to “help researchers find the work in databases and web sites” (APA guidelines, 2010, as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.33), resembles the former, imply that the writers might have selected other guidelines than APA (2001).
Conversely, the organizational structure of the abstracts in the medicine RAs seem to observe a different academic convention. For example, in Martínez, Assimes, Mines, Dell’Aniello and Suissa’s (2010) paper, the title for the abstract and the several subheadings that follow are left-aligned -non-centered. The length of the abstract, which involves many paragraphs, exceeds the APA (2001) standard parameters -125 to 150 words long.
Concerning discursive elements, Almerich et al (2005) denote use of present tenses in the conclusions of the study, probably to aim at challenging future research on the topic. Text composing involves past tense to indicate results, impersonal passive and full affirmative sentences (Graetz, 1985, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Acronyms like “ANOVA model” are unexplained (Almerich et al 2005); perhaps to express common usage in the field area.
Wijeysundera, Beattie, Elliot, Austin, Hux and Laupacis (2010) possibly signal modern relevance of the research (Swales & Feak, 1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010) by using present tense in the conclusions. Acronyms are defined in the text to prevent misleading. Negatives are avoided (Graetz, 1985, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). It seems likely that the use of full sentences is limited to the results and conclusions to credit facts.
All in all, the four RAs share a same informative type of structure and evidence some similar organizational characteristics than those depicted by Swales and Feak (1994, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010); for example, use of past and present tenses, full sentences, acronym clarification, absence of negatives and impersonal passive –conceivably to focus on factual features. Yet, the main differences tend to lie in abstract layout. It might be suggested that medicine RAs obey a different methodological approach than educational RAs.
References
Almerich, J., Suárez, J. M., Orellana, N., Belloch, C., Bo, R., & Gastaldo, I. (2005). Diferencias en los conocimientos de los recursos tecnológicos en profesores a partir del género, edad, y tipo de centro. RELIEVE, 11 (2), 127-142. Retrieved from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=5750
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Jorgensen, K. J., Zahl, P.H., & Gotzsche, P.C. (2010). Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: Comparative study. BMJ, 340 (c1241), 1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1241
Martínez, C., Assimes, T.L., Mines, D., Dell’Aniello, S., & Suissa, S. (2010). Use of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and the risk of sudden cardiac death or near death: A nested case-control study. BMJ, 340 (c249), 1-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c249
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2010). Unit 4: Research Articles: Abstracts. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved May 22, 2010 from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4691
Wijeysundera, D.N., Beattie, W. S., Elliot, R.F., Austin, P. C., Hux, J.E., & Laupacis, A. (2010). Non-invasive cardiac stress testing before elective major non-cardiac surgery: Population based cohort study. BMJ, 340 (b5526), 1-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5526
Data report: A comparative analysis of research articles
In a research article, the text of the results section depicts objectively the data collected. The Discussion section presents the interpretation of those study findings. The conclusion, which can be embedded in the previous section or not, summarizes the overall information the article, describes (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). This paper aims to compare these sections in two different field research articles using Swales’ criteria (1998, cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010).
Analysis of the results section in a medicine article indicates the inclusion of four tables that were correctly numbered and acknowledged though the layout did not follow the data presentation sequence in accordance with Swales’ (1998) pattern (cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). For example, tables 1, 3 and 4 were outside the margins of the results sections and not below the informative paragraph in order to clarify the data.
Conversely, in this example: “Table 2. Cox regression (…)” (De Oliveira, Watt & Hamer, 2010, p.3) the author inserted the table in the correct place and it served the purpose to help to define the variables involved. It is important to consider that for paper publishing requirements some manuscripts can suffer format transformations in order to fit certain academic journals web sites requirements.
In contrast, the education article used neither tables nor figures, which may suggest that the relevance of the study was placed on the overall results and not on the figures obtained during the research work –the type of research could be mixed: qualitative-quantitative. The section introduced a part entitled “Quantitative data analysis highlighted (…)” (Seliem & Ahmed, 2009, p.19), listing percentages and a brief description of study findings.
Additionally, in the same article, Seliem and Ahmed (2009) used direct quotes to support the study findings but failed to acknowledge those sources in the references list (Pintos, 2009). For example, “Dr. Lamiaa said: my students were actively involved (…)” (Seliem & Ahmed, 2009, p.20). It could be the case that the quotes addressed belonged to other colleagues/ researchers who also took part in the research work.
Regarding the Discussion section, Seliem and Ahmed (2009) considered the interpretation of the study results and provided “reasons for the data patterns turning out the ways they did” (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.20). Use of modals like “should” seems to suggest advice to follow in possible future studies; present tense signaled the discussion (Pintos & Crimi, 2010), probably to stress the contemporary relevance of the study. However, the rest of the in-text citations addressing the background theory followed academic requirements (Pintos, 2009).
The medicine article exhibited present passive voice and present tenses use to relate to the discussion explanations. The text incorporated confirmations of previous studies, cited in the references list, plus some suggestions and topic associations that completed the framework. The Discussion section included strengths and limitations of the study, conclusions,
contributors, funding, competing interests, ethical approval and list of references.
Contrastively, the Conclusion section in Seliem and Ahmed’s text (2009) looked brief, perhaps because the results were not as they were expected to. Though “unnecessary” (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.20), the paragraph opened with the concluding phrase “in conclusion” and re-assumed the concept conveyed throughout the study. Conversely, the Conclusion section in the medicine article began re-stating the confirmation of the medical findings.
In all, both articles presented a brief but accurate description about facts in the results sections. Illustrative materials, like charts and graphs were excluded with the exception of tables. Tenses use to signal either results or discussions was respected, the same as the principle of simplicity in communication (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). The main differences can be found in the Conclusion sections since both articles represent different pattern styles.
References
De Oliveira, C., Watt, R., & Hamer, M. (2010). Toothbrushing, inflammation, and risk of cardiovascular disease: results from Scottish Health Survey. British Medical Journal, 340
(c2451), 1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2451
Pintos, V. (2009). Unit 4: Reporting and Reviewing. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/index.php?id=54
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2010). Unit 3: The Research Article: Results, Discussions and Conclusions. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved April 24, 2010
from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4692
Seliem, S., & Ahmed, A. (2009). Missing: Electronic feedback in Egyptian EFL essay writing classes. Paper presented at the CDELT Conference of the Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=3782
Analysis of the results section in a medicine article indicates the inclusion of four tables that were correctly numbered and acknowledged though the layout did not follow the data presentation sequence in accordance with Swales’ (1998) pattern (cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). For example, tables 1, 3 and 4 were outside the margins of the results sections and not below the informative paragraph in order to clarify the data.
Conversely, in this example: “Table 2. Cox regression (…)” (De Oliveira, Watt & Hamer, 2010, p.3) the author inserted the table in the correct place and it served the purpose to help to define the variables involved. It is important to consider that for paper publishing requirements some manuscripts can suffer format transformations in order to fit certain academic journals web sites requirements.
In contrast, the education article used neither tables nor figures, which may suggest that the relevance of the study was placed on the overall results and not on the figures obtained during the research work –the type of research could be mixed: qualitative-quantitative. The section introduced a part entitled “Quantitative data analysis highlighted (…)” (Seliem & Ahmed, 2009, p.19), listing percentages and a brief description of study findings.
Additionally, in the same article, Seliem and Ahmed (2009) used direct quotes to support the study findings but failed to acknowledge those sources in the references list (Pintos, 2009). For example, “Dr. Lamiaa said: my students were actively involved (…)” (Seliem & Ahmed, 2009, p.20). It could be the case that the quotes addressed belonged to other colleagues/ researchers who also took part in the research work.
Regarding the Discussion section, Seliem and Ahmed (2009) considered the interpretation of the study results and provided “reasons for the data patterns turning out the ways they did” (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.20). Use of modals like “should” seems to suggest advice to follow in possible future studies; present tense signaled the discussion (Pintos & Crimi, 2010), probably to stress the contemporary relevance of the study. However, the rest of the in-text citations addressing the background theory followed academic requirements (Pintos, 2009).
The medicine article exhibited present passive voice and present tenses use to relate to the discussion explanations. The text incorporated confirmations of previous studies, cited in the references list, plus some suggestions and topic associations that completed the framework. The Discussion section included strengths and limitations of the study, conclusions,
contributors, funding, competing interests, ethical approval and list of references.
Contrastively, the Conclusion section in Seliem and Ahmed’s text (2009) looked brief, perhaps because the results were not as they were expected to. Though “unnecessary” (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.20), the paragraph opened with the concluding phrase “in conclusion” and re-assumed the concept conveyed throughout the study. Conversely, the Conclusion section in the medicine article began re-stating the confirmation of the medical findings.
In all, both articles presented a brief but accurate description about facts in the results sections. Illustrative materials, like charts and graphs were excluded with the exception of tables. Tenses use to signal either results or discussions was respected, the same as the principle of simplicity in communication (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). The main differences can be found in the Conclusion sections since both articles represent different pattern styles.
References
De Oliveira, C., Watt, R., & Hamer, M. (2010). Toothbrushing, inflammation, and risk of cardiovascular disease: results from Scottish Health Survey. British Medical Journal, 340
(c2451), 1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2451
Pintos, V. (2009). Unit 4: Reporting and Reviewing. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/index.php?id=54
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2010). Unit 3: The Research Article: Results, Discussions and Conclusions. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved April 24, 2010
from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4692
Seliem, S., & Ahmed, A. (2009). Missing: Electronic feedback in Egyptian EFL essay writing classes. Paper presented at the CDELT Conference of the Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=3782
A sense of perspective in research articles
English for Specific Purposes (ESP) comparative analysis of research articles describes the main features to consider in the process of writing academically. Not only do researchers require specific field knowledge but expertise competences in composing as well, to be accepted in academic settings when writing about scientific findings and explorations. This paper aims at considering important aspects of composing through the examination of two research articles from the educational and medical fields.
The structure of research articles involves particular components like the Introduction, the Literature review and the Methods section (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Introductions pose a challenge to readers; the goal is to keep reader interested by providing a general outline of the main ideas of the piece of writing (Pintos & Crimi, 2010), to introduce the topic.
The Literature review section delineates the theoretical framework that supports the study issue. This part suggests a double purpose: to inform and help the reader understand what studies have been established on a certain topic and to develop critical thinking –i.e.: analysis of research studies findings, grounding further research on the same topic.
The Methods section contains detailed information about the methodological approach of the study case; about how the research has been conducted. Thus, it includes sub-headings that explain procedures, participants involved, materials and type of design used in the experiment. The objective is to allow researchers to replicate the scientific test.
Swales and Feak (1994) proposed structuring introductions in a pattern arranged according to Create a Research Space Model (C.A.R.S.) (as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Three moves or cycles allow main ideas to flow from the general to the particular: Move 1 settles the study context framed by previous research work; Move 2, underlines the interest of the study; Move 3, determines the study aims and may expand on findings description.
For example, in Loucky’s (2007) article, moves analysis reveals use of present tense in Move 1; i.e.: “Learners from non-European language backgrounds are at a…” (para.1, Introduction section), signaling present issue information. It could be suggested that citation patterns are excluded from the first move because the author has opted to include them in the Literature review section (Pintos and Crimi, 2010), following the American Psychology Association guidelines (as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.37).
Move 2 –linked to Move 1- exhibits use of negatives; i.e.: “…, since they have no cognates…” (para.1, Introduction section). There is light mention of the gap, the motivation of the study. It seems that the author has embedded the gap in the statement in the previous move. Moreover, Move 3 requirements are fulfilled: past tense is used in reference to study type and it states the study purposes; i.e.: “This study examined…which can be of particular help to” (para.1, Introduction section).
The Method section provides a complete description of the procedure, including materials employed and participants involved –number, level of knowledge, gender, course details like time frame for instance. The setting of the experiment is also mentioned. Linguistic features like used of passive voice can also be noted. The title of the section is centered at its start (Swales, 1990; Swales & Feak, 1994; OWL, 2008 as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.34).
On comparing the preceding educational article with Norman’s (2008) research report from the medicine field, many differences can be observed. For instance, though the structure presents an abstract, key words section, a body, Acknowledgements and Conflict of interest sections and many appendixes, aspects that indicate similarities between the two research articles, no Introduction section can be clearly identified in the medicine paper. It could be the case that Norman (2008) has used another manuscript formatting style.
The main body of the paper consists of a group of paragraphs involving a moves-step structure, which certainly reflect the main characteristics of moves; i.e.: present tense is used to pose the current issue, “tobacco control is at a crossroads” (para.1). Further use of present perfect tense marks areas of inquiry (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.29); i.e.: “…where tobacco companies have focused their marketing efforts” (para.3).
The article presents no theoretical background; there are no obligatory citation patterns and no literature review embedded in the body of the paper (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). There is neither Methods section that could explain the research work carried nor description of the participants involved. The article focuses mainly on promoting the advantages of the study and the materials used in it; i.e.: cell phones and other mobile devices. Conceivably, medical research reports tend to follow different manuscript presentation styles than those from the educational field.
To conclude, comparative analysis of both articles showed that only the educational one fulfills academic requirements for composing papers as regards format, linguistic features and moves-structure according to Swales and Feak’s (1994) perspective (cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). One possible explanation of the case could be that, in general, medical papers tend to follow a different methodological type of research that requires its own manuscript presentation style. In competitive academic settings, writers should commit themselves more to achieve composing goals in order to gain acceptance and to be able to provide useful insights about their research work.
References
Norman, C. (2008). Web-Assisted Tobacco Interventions: Empowering Change in the Global Fight for the Public’s (e) Health.10(5), 48. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from: http://www.jmir.org/2008/5/e48/HTML
Loucky, J.P. (2007). Improving online reading and vocabulary development. KASELE Bulletin, 35, 181-188. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2010). Unit 2: The Research Article: Introduction, Literature Review and Methods Section. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved April 3, 2010 from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4691
The structure of research articles involves particular components like the Introduction, the Literature review and the Methods section (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Introductions pose a challenge to readers; the goal is to keep reader interested by providing a general outline of the main ideas of the piece of writing (Pintos & Crimi, 2010), to introduce the topic.
The Literature review section delineates the theoretical framework that supports the study issue. This part suggests a double purpose: to inform and help the reader understand what studies have been established on a certain topic and to develop critical thinking –i.e.: analysis of research studies findings, grounding further research on the same topic.
The Methods section contains detailed information about the methodological approach of the study case; about how the research has been conducted. Thus, it includes sub-headings that explain procedures, participants involved, materials and type of design used in the experiment. The objective is to allow researchers to replicate the scientific test.
Swales and Feak (1994) proposed structuring introductions in a pattern arranged according to Create a Research Space Model (C.A.R.S.) (as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). Three moves or cycles allow main ideas to flow from the general to the particular: Move 1 settles the study context framed by previous research work; Move 2, underlines the interest of the study; Move 3, determines the study aims and may expand on findings description.
For example, in Loucky’s (2007) article, moves analysis reveals use of present tense in Move 1; i.e.: “Learners from non-European language backgrounds are at a…” (para.1, Introduction section), signaling present issue information. It could be suggested that citation patterns are excluded from the first move because the author has opted to include them in the Literature review section (Pintos and Crimi, 2010), following the American Psychology Association guidelines (as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.37).
Move 2 –linked to Move 1- exhibits use of negatives; i.e.: “…, since they have no cognates…” (para.1, Introduction section). There is light mention of the gap, the motivation of the study. It seems that the author has embedded the gap in the statement in the previous move. Moreover, Move 3 requirements are fulfilled: past tense is used in reference to study type and it states the study purposes; i.e.: “This study examined…which can be of particular help to” (para.1, Introduction section).
The Method section provides a complete description of the procedure, including materials employed and participants involved –number, level of knowledge, gender, course details like time frame for instance. The setting of the experiment is also mentioned. Linguistic features like used of passive voice can also be noted. The title of the section is centered at its start (Swales, 1990; Swales & Feak, 1994; OWL, 2008 as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.34).
On comparing the preceding educational article with Norman’s (2008) research report from the medicine field, many differences can be observed. For instance, though the structure presents an abstract, key words section, a body, Acknowledgements and Conflict of interest sections and many appendixes, aspects that indicate similarities between the two research articles, no Introduction section can be clearly identified in the medicine paper. It could be the case that Norman (2008) has used another manuscript formatting style.
The main body of the paper consists of a group of paragraphs involving a moves-step structure, which certainly reflect the main characteristics of moves; i.e.: present tense is used to pose the current issue, “tobacco control is at a crossroads” (para.1). Further use of present perfect tense marks areas of inquiry (Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.29); i.e.: “…where tobacco companies have focused their marketing efforts” (para.3).
The article presents no theoretical background; there are no obligatory citation patterns and no literature review embedded in the body of the paper (Pintos & Crimi, 2010). There is neither Methods section that could explain the research work carried nor description of the participants involved. The article focuses mainly on promoting the advantages of the study and the materials used in it; i.e.: cell phones and other mobile devices. Conceivably, medical research reports tend to follow different manuscript presentation styles than those from the educational field.
To conclude, comparative analysis of both articles showed that only the educational one fulfills academic requirements for composing papers as regards format, linguistic features and moves-structure according to Swales and Feak’s (1994) perspective (cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010). One possible explanation of the case could be that, in general, medical papers tend to follow a different methodological type of research that requires its own manuscript presentation style. In competitive academic settings, writers should commit themselves more to achieve composing goals in order to gain acceptance and to be able to provide useful insights about their research work.
References
Norman, C. (2008). Web-Assisted Tobacco Interventions: Empowering Change in the Global Fight for the Public’s (e) Health.10(5), 48. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from: http://www.jmir.org/2008/5/e48/HTML
Loucky, J.P. (2007). Improving online reading and vocabulary development. KASELE Bulletin, 35, 181-188. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/
Pintos, V., & Crimi, Y. (2010). Unit 2: The Research Article: Introduction, Literature Review and Methods Section. Universidad CAECE: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Retrieved April 3, 2010 from: http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=4691
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)